Higher rates for Columbia SC flood insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program took effect on April 1st. The increase hiked individual policy premiums for homeowners in high-risk areas by as much as 25 percent.
The Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 carries some premium increases of up to 18 percent for primary homeowners and 25 percent for owners of vacation homes or rental properties. A new surcharge will also be assessed.
Most homeowners' insurance policies don't cover flood damage, although many cover natural disasters such as hurricanes, with the most expensive policies tied to coastal properties that are most vulnerable to storm damage.
Most consumers in designated low-lying zones must buy special coverage to add protection against floods. The average premium for Columbia SC flood insurance is $650 a year, according to the federal flood insurance program.
Columbia SC Flood Insurance Isn't Mandatory
Columbia SC flood insurance isn't mandatory in most cases, especially if you own your home outright. But homes and businesses in flood-prone areas are required to have flood insurance to qualify for federally insured mortgages. Essentially, this means that flood protection is needed by a majority of homeowners.
Although Columbia SC flood insurance is not mandatory, like with windstorm coverage, flood insurance rates for some properties in high-risk areas can be much higher. About 5.2 million Americans carry flood insurance policies. The premium increases are estimated to affect about one million of these homeowners according to a spokesman for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which administers the flood program.
Because of massive hurricane damage, from Katrina, Sandy and other destructive events — the flood insurance program has racked up billions of dollars in debt. But last year's Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act (HFIAA) eases the impact of rate increases for many policy holders.
In passing HFIAA, Congress rolled back price hikes called for under previous legislation, the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012, after coastal property owners, state lawmakers and real estate interests complained.
Find more articles as they relate to Columbia SC flood insurance under our Columbia SC Insurance section of articles to your right under Columbia SC Real Estate Categories.
A new report details the cost and extent of one of the worst years for floods in recent history.
CoreLogic estimates flood losses in the U.S. this year at approximately $10.67 billion, three times the amount forecast for next year, based on various flooding and storm events recorded in the National Climate Data Center.
CoreLogic suggests that flood insurance coverage to be expanded to protect more territory. The floods of 2011 heightened awareness of the flood risk outside of the FEMA 100-year flood zones, the report states. There has also been an emphasized need to raise current flood protection standards for the critical and strategic infrastructures in the U.S.
Based on the trend pattern, 2012 should not be an extreme flood year – in fact, there should be several more years before the next extreme flood loss year. U.S. flood loss in 2012 is projected at approximately $3.53 billion.
Before the federal program was launched in 1968, few private carriers provided flood insurance because of the cost and destructive power of floods. Under the program, homeowners in FEMA flood zones are required to buy policies from insurance companies — about 90 provide it — and the government pays for flood damage with federal funds collected largely from homeowner premiums.
This year’s big losses could drive the program further into the red, or it could underscore the need to continue and possibly expand the program to protect property that does not qualify for coverage today.
Do you have flood insurance? We’d love to hear how you feel about the federally funded flood insurance program. Is it too costly for our government to continue funding, or do you think it’s something our government should offer at whatever the cost? Click the comment link below and tell us what you think.
Homeowner’s insurance can be a bit complicated. One of the best ways to make the most of your homeowners insurance is to have an up-to-date home inventory of your personal possessions.
You can also better protect yourself by knowing what’s covered and what’s not.
Here are the five most common misconceptions about homeowners insurance:
- Damaged items are replaced at cost. When surveyed, most policy holders did not know the difference between cash value vs. replacement cost. Actual cash value refers to the amount it takes to repair or replace a home’s contents after depreciation. On the other hand, replacement cost pays the amount actually spent to repair or replace the property. Replacement cost coverage for your personal items is included in some policies, but if your policy does not provide the coverage, it is typically available at an additional cost.
- Flood damage is covered. Not true. Most standard homeowners policies do not cover damage sustained by floods, even though 33 percent of policy holders think otherwise. Be sure to check your policy’s limits, and get flood coverage if you think you’re at risk.
- Mold damage is covered. Not true. Like termite infestation, mold damage is generally not covered under the typical policy, although some policies cover a limited amount of mold damage if the damage is the result of a covered water loss. Take measures to reduce your risk by:
*Moderating your home’s humidity level.
*Check for damp walls or carpets that could serve as mold breeding grounds.
*Repair water leaks promptly.
*Replace washing machine hoses on a routine basis to avoid accidental leakage.
*When leaving your home for an extended time, turn off water and drain pipes.
- Sewer backups are covered. Not true. Sewer backups are generally excluded from most policies, but some companies offer extra coverage for damage caused by water or sewage which backs up from off the homeowner’s property.
- Earthquake damage is covered. Not true. As with floods, standard insurance policies generally don’t cover earthquake damage, so if you feel your house is at risk, you may want to purchase a separate Earthquake endorsement to make sure you’re protected.
If in doubt, ask! Check with your insurance provider BEFORE disaster strikes and you find out you’re not covered for that.
The House of Representatives passed yet another short-term re-authorization of the National Flood Insurance Program. The most recent extension will keep the program going through November 18. This is just the most recent in a series of short-term extensions to the NFIP. Apparently there are legislative efforts to extend the program for the next five years.
No bank will lend on a property in a flood-prone area without flood insurance. So when the NFIP lapses (as it did last year), it makes it nearly impossible to sell a home in a flood area, and any scheduled sales are held up due to the lack of insurance. Regardless of whether it makes sense for the government to encourage people to build homes in a potential flood zone is a separate issue, because these houses already exist and are dependent upon the NFP. This is the system we are largely stuck with.
In light of this, some groups, such as the National Association of Realtors (NAR), are advocating for a long term extension of the NFIP. In a press release, the NAR stated that “the NAR strongly supports the NFIP and believes that a 5-year extension of the program’s authority to issue flood insurance is essential to a properly functioning real estate market”.
There really is no excuse for Congress not to extend the NFIP as the many real estate transactions are utterly dependent upon it. Since 2002, the program has been allowed to lapse 11 times, and then retroactively re-authorized.